If a compliance software costs $12,000 a year. Does that sound expensive?
It’s all about what you’re replacing.
If technology can eliminate hundreds of hours of repetitive evidence collection in a tangled technology-driven environment, $12,000 could be money well spent. If a seven-person startup could gather the same evidence manually in a few hours each month, the calculation is quite different.
It’s a good way to start your look for Vanta. Do not begin by asking which platform offers the most features. Consider what these features can help your business save time and effort.
Automated Manufacturing Comes with an End-of-Even
It’s not necessarily either good or bad. Scale affects its value. Imagine a tech company which is expanding, multiple cloud environments, many applications and frequent changes in access. Manually collecting evidence could be a major burden for the operation. Integrations that automatically monitor systems and gather evidence could easily justify the cost.
Imagine a startup with 10 employees working on their first SOC 2. It might have a small infrastructure, and the evidence collection could be handled with minimal automation.
That difference matters when evaluating Vanta pricing. The capabilities of a modern platform are impressive, however they are only useful in the event that an organization requires them.
Compare Architecture and not just Brands
A search for Vanta vs Drata can quickly become a feature-by-feature exercise. Both are well-established compliance platforms built around automation and integrations, so comparing their supported frameworks and integrations, services, agreements, and individual quotes are useful for businesses searching for that method.
There’s a second decision you’ll need to take. Do you have a company that is interested in an integration-driven platform for compliance? Some companies want constant monitoring as well as automated evidence collection. Certain businesses prefer collecting evidence themselves.
Vanta Competitors Do not All Use the Same Model
A number of well-known Vanta competitors compete within the same category of automation. There are also platforms that are less heavy which focus on organization and large system connectivity.
CertAssist is part of the latter group. CertAssist, created by internal auditors, compliance consultants and other professionals, is a system for organizing controls frameworks into a single workspace. It offers editable guidelines and policies for auditing, and permits auditors to look over evidence using read-only access.
It deliberately does not connect to operating systems, nor install infrastructure agents. Customers upload and choose the documents they would like to provide.
The System Access consideration in the Making
It is obvious that removing integrations is a disadvantage. It is necessary to collect evidence by hand.
This eliminates the need to integrate and the implementation of compliance is not dependent on a connection to the operational environment.
Both of these architectures are equally great. It is important to ask which tradeoffs make sense to your business.
CertAssist is targeted at companies with five to 200 employees and gives pricing information instead of having an actual sales call. The advertised price of launch for CertAssist is $225 a month instead of the usual $375.
Let Complexity Be In Control
The needs of a 10-person company today may not be its requirements at 100 or 500 employees.
A simple platform could make sense, while compliance is easy. The cost of automation could grow as systems, staff and frameworks expand. Allow complexity to take the lead when it comes to purchasing compliance technology.
Don’t spend money on fifty integrations simply because they look attractive in a chart of comparison. It is best to pay for them only if the cost of doing the job they replace by hand is greater.
